Skip to content
No results
  • Home
  • Shop
    • Right Sidebar
    • Left Sidebar
  • Products
    • My Account
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • News
Facebook Twitter Instagram
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Forgot Password?

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you

← Back to login
Fire systems
Login
0

No products in the cart.

  • Home
  • Shop
    • Right Sidebar
    • Left Sidebar
  • Products
    • My Account
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • News
Fire systems
0

No products in the cart.

Twitter Subpoenas Musk’s Banks in Fight Over Acquisition

  • wpadmwpadm
  • 04.08.2022
  • Uncategorized




Twitter Subpoenas Musk’s Banks in Fight Over Acquisition






























  • Home
  • Articles
  • Twitter Subpoenas Musk’s Banks in Fight Over Acquisition

Twitter has sent dozens of subpoenas in recent days to the banks and investors that were backing Elon Musk in his bid to acquire the company, while also seeking more information about well-known technology industry personalities who are considered close to Mr. Musk.

The subpoenas are part of efforts to help determine whether Mr. Musk had quietly abandoned his deal to acquire Twitter even before he told it of his plans to do so, which would breach his contract with the company, said two people familiar with Twitter’s thinking, who requested anonymity because the discussions were private.

Under the terms of the deal, Mr. Musk must use “reasonable best efforts” to close the sale, including securing debt financing for the $44 billion purchase. But Twitter claims in a lawsuit against Mr. Musk in Delaware Chancery Court that he appeared to have abandoned efforts to complete his financing, contravening the agreement.

Mr. Musk, who is one of the world’s richest men, signed commitment letters with a number of Wall Street banks, led by Morgan Stanley, for a total of $13 billion in debt financing. He later brought in Silicon Valley investors, including the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, to provide about $7 billion in financing.

In subpoenas sent to investment banks working for Mr. Musk, including Morgan Stanley, Barclays and Bank of America, Twitter demanded information related to his efforts to consummate his debt financing, including his expected timeline for doing so. Twitter is also requesting information about Mr. Musk’s decision to scrap his loan against his Tesla shares to help finance the deal.

What Happened to Elon Musk’s Twitter Deal


Card 1 of 6

A blockbuster deal. In April, Elon Musk made an unsolicited bid worth more than $40 billion for the social network, saying he wanted to make Twitter a private company and allow people to speak more freely on the service.

Mr. Musk had originally planned to take out a roughly $12 billion loan against his Tesla stock. But shares of the electric-vehicle maker plummeted in the weeks after he signed the deal, making such a loan considerably more risky.

Twitter also asked for more information about any analysis that banks have done at Mr. Musk’s instruction about the number of fake users on its platform. He has cited his concerns about fake accounts on Twitter as a reason he wants to withdraw his offer.

What Mr. Musk’s bankers demanded — and why — could be crucial for the deal. Twitter’s ability to sue Mr. Musk to force him to close the deal, under its “specific performance clause,” is voided if his debt financing falls apart. But that escape works only if the banks, which have signed commitment letters, walk away independently — not if Mr. Musk prods them.

“The Delaware courts themselves are very wary about people who basically have their fingerprints all over self-sabotage,” said Eric Talley, a professor of corporate law at Columbia Law School.

Representatives for Morgan Stanley and Barclays declined to comment. A spokesperson for Bank of America did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Musk filed a response to Twitter’s lawsuit on Friday, though it is temporarily sealed to the public while he and Twitter negotiate which parts to redact. His arguments justifying his decision to walk away from the Twitter deal so far have focused on the company’s public disclosures about bots and fake accounts.

His lawyers have implied that those disclosures were materially misleading, which could give Mr. Musk grounds to back out of the deal. (Twitter’s lawyers have asked what, exactly, was misleading.)

Twitter’s legal outreach over the past week also sought more information about conversations with a number of the Silicon Valley heavyweights Mr. Musk is known to be close to. That information could shed further light into the evolution of his thinking about a deal, once he began to send tweets implying that he might want to back out or take another cut at it for a lower price.

In a subpoena issued to Valor Equity Partners, the investment firm founded by Antonio Gracias, a longtime friend of Mr. Musk’s, Twitter’s lawyers sought more information about conversations with Chamath Palihapitiya, the chief executive of Social Capital, and David Sacks, a general partner at the investment firm Craft Ventures, among others. Both Mr. Palihapitiya and Mr. Sacks were at a private conference in which Mr. Musk expressed doubt about Twitter’s disclosures concerning its number of fake accounts.

The Washington Post reported earlier that Twitter was seeking more information about Mr. Musk’s acquaintances.

A spokesman for Mr. Palihapitiya declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Mr. Sacks did not respond to a request for comment.

Twitter also asked Valor for any information pertaining to Bob Swan, a former chief executive of Intel who played a key role in putting the deal together. Twitter has claimed that Mr. Musk fired Mr. Swan, saying the two men were “not on the same wavelength,” and later replaced him with Mr. Gracias. But according to Twitter’s lawsuit, Mr. Gracias “never appeared” to take over the financing effort that Mr. Swan “had helmed.”

Mr. Gracias did not respond to a request for comment.

Kate Conger contributed reporting.

Source link

Still have questions?

We will help to answer them

You may also be interested






Using the website allows you to use cookies and services to collect technical data of visitors (IP addresses, location, etc.) to ensure the performance and improve the quality of the website. More details



Source link

Leave a ReplyCancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending now

UniVario YMX5000
Wasser indicator (open/closed) without LED
Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Additional Wireless PIR Motion Sensor – EF-PIR
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube Vimeo
  • Shop
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • My account

About Us

  • About Organization
  • Our Clients
  • Our Partners

Achievements

Biggest marketplace for professional parts

Quick Links

  • Introduction
  • Organisation Team
  • Press Enquiries

Useful Information

www.pro-parts.info

Important Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Shipping Information

From call agent arranged

Contact Info

Nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa arcu odio ut sem nulla pharetra diam amet.
  • Address: 123112, Moscow, Presnenskaya Nab. 6, bld. 2,
  • Phone: 578-393-4937
  • Email: info@pro-parts.com
Copyright © 2023 - WordPress Theme by CreativeThemes
en English
ar Arabicen Englishde Germanru Russian

Sign In

Don't have an account yet? Register

Forgot password?

Register

Already have an account? Sign In

Reset Password

Please enter your username or email address, you will receive a link to create a new password via email.

VISHAL MAJUMDAR - FREELANCER |... · SIMPLE